PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS COMPANY

When the
stakes
are high.

AISEENT is an analytics company for businesses and public-sector organisations. We compare scenarios, assess risks and review forecasts before consequential decisions.

Move your cursor to shape the fieldProbability branches

Main pathsRare branchesExcluded

Probability branches: shared foundations, different outcomes.

01Data and context02Possible scenarios03Informed choices

01 / WHAT WE DO

Your forecast.
An independent view.

You may already have a forecast from an internal team or a consultant. AISEENT helps examine its foundations: the evidence behind the conclusion, the assumptions it depends on and what changes under a different course of events.

For questions of strategy, growth and risk management. Start with a review of one decision.

02 / EXPERTISE

The question defines
the scope of work.

01

Decision scenarios

What could follow from your choice?

We compare possible outcomes and the conditions that would bring them about, identifying the factors with the greatest influence on the result.

Output: scenarios and key assumptions
02

A second opinion

What supports the existing forecast?

We examine the data, model logic and sensitivity of the conclusions, showing which assessments have support and which need further investigation.

Output: evidence, disagreements and questions to test
03

A map of risks

What matters before the decision?

We examine risks in the areas you identify, their potential consequences and signals of change, highlighting what deserves attention first.

Output: priorities, consequences and signals

03 / THINKING IN SCENARIOS

Before choosing a path,
explore the alternatives.

Look at one question from several angles. Choose an example challenge.

THE QUESTION

Enter a new market now — or adapt the offer first?

WHAT WE EXAMINE

  • Demand and competition
  • Resources and constraints
  • Conditions that could shift the outlook

Scenario probabilities

Illustrative example
Baseline scenario55%Alternative scenario30%Stress scenario15%
55%Baseline scenario30%Alternative scenario15%Stress scenario
Initial conditionsPossible consequences
Main scenariosLow-probability branchesExcluded models

Thin branches are variations within the three scenarios. Dashed lines that end early represent models excluded from the final assessment.

Models and selection rationale

Illustrative model selection

Demand and competition

In comparison

Compare demand, competitors and available resources.

An adapted offer

In comparison

Compare entry with the original and an adapted offer.

Growth without constraints

Excluded

The assumption ignores team and budget limits.

WHAT THE ANALYSIS PROVIDES

A comparison of entry options and the factors that could strengthen or weaken each one.

The diagram, probabilities and model selection are illustrative. They are not findings from an actual study.

04 / OUR APPROACH

The question first.
Then the examination.

We separate facts from assumptions, establish what can be tested and identify information gaps. We define the limits within which the findings can inform a decision.

01

Define the question

Clarify the decision, what is at stake and when the findings are needed.

02

Examine the foundations

Review sources, data and assumptions. Make gaps and limitations explicit.

03

Compare scenarios

Explore alternatives and the conditions that would change the assessment. Show where the results diverge.

04

Explain the findings

Connect the analysis to your question: risks, possible outcomes and reasons to reconsider the decision.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A basis for your decision.

The scope depends on the question. Three things should be clear in the findings.

01

Scenarios and assessments

Possible outcomes and the conditions behind them. Numerical probabilities where the evidence supports them.

02

Risks and signals

What could change the picture, and which events to watch for so you can reconsider the decision in time.

03

Evidence and limits

Sources, key assumptions, disagreements and questions that cannot yet be answered with confidence.

OUR WORKING PRINCIPLE

We explain the forecast.
And what could change it.

We show which evidence supports the conclusion and which assumptions still need testing. We explain the period the forecast covers and the changes that would call for a reassessment.

When there is not enough information to make an assessment, we say so and identify the data needed.

05 / ONE QUESTION

Let’s discuss
your question.

What decision are you facing? Is there a forecast you want to examine? Two or three sentences are enough to start the conversation.

DIRECT CONTACT

Message us
on Telegram