Decision scenarios
What could follow from your choice?
We compare possible outcomes and the conditions that would bring them about, identifying the factors with the greatest influence on the result.
PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS COMPANY
AISEENT is an analytics company for businesses and public-sector organisations. We compare scenarios, assess risks and review forecasts before consequential decisions.
Move your cursor to shape the fieldProbability branches
Probability branches: shared foundations, different outcomes.
01 / WHAT WE DO
You may already have a forecast from an internal team or a consultant. AISEENT helps examine its foundations: the evidence behind the conclusion, the assumptions it depends on and what changes under a different course of events.
For questions of strategy, growth and risk management. Start with a review of one decision.
02 / EXPERTISE
What could follow from your choice?
We compare possible outcomes and the conditions that would bring them about, identifying the factors with the greatest influence on the result.
What supports the existing forecast?
We examine the data, model logic and sensitivity of the conclusions, showing which assessments have support and which need further investigation.
What matters before the decision?
We examine risks in the areas you identify, their potential consequences and signals of change, highlighting what deserves attention first.
03 / THINKING IN SCENARIOS
Look at one question from several angles. Choose an example challenge.
THE QUESTION
WHAT WE EXAMINE
Scenario probabilities
Illustrative exampleThin branches are variations within the three scenarios. Dashed lines that end early represent models excluded from the final assessment.
Illustrative model selection
Compare demand, competitors and available resources.
Compare entry with the original and an adapted offer.
The assumption ignores team and budget limits.
WHAT THE ANALYSIS PROVIDES
A comparison of entry options and the factors that could strengthen or weaken each one.
The diagram, probabilities and model selection are illustrative. They are not findings from an actual study.
04 / OUR APPROACH
We separate facts from assumptions, establish what can be tested and identify information gaps. We define the limits within which the findings can inform a decision.
Clarify the decision, what is at stake and when the findings are needed.
Review sources, data and assumptions. Make gaps and limitations explicit.
Explore alternatives and the conditions that would change the assessment. Show where the results diverge.
Connect the analysis to your question: risks, possible outcomes and reasons to reconsider the decision.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
The scope depends on the question. Three things should be clear in the findings.
Possible outcomes and the conditions behind them. Numerical probabilities where the evidence supports them.
What could change the picture, and which events to watch for so you can reconsider the decision in time.
Sources, key assumptions, disagreements and questions that cannot yet be answered with confidence.
OUR WORKING PRINCIPLE
We show which evidence supports the conclusion and which assumptions still need testing. We explain the period the forecast covers and the changes that would call for a reassessment.
When there is not enough information to make an assessment, we say so and identify the data needed.
05 / ONE QUESTION
What decision are you facing? Is there a forecast you want to examine? Two or three sentences are enough to start the conversation.
DIRECT CONTACT
Message us